Check across airlines
Eastpak Pinnacle 38L
Compare carry-on and personal-item size across 155 airlines.
Choose another bag
- Configuration
- Standard
- Measurements
- 41.9 × 32 × 25.4 cm
- Capacity
- 38 L
- Empty weight
- 0.67 kg
Size overview
*Within limits for at least one baggage category, including close fits. Check both categories below. Size fit does not mean your ticket includes the bag.
How to read these results
Every active airline is accounted for: 155 / 155.
What does “unresolved” mean? We have this bag’s measurements. These airlines need more information before we can confirm a fit.
- 8 meet the combined-size limit. The airline specifies a total for length + width + depth, but no usable limit for each side. Actual storage fit still needs checking.
- 13 need trip details. Open an airline’s check and add the requested aircraft, route or fare to narrow the result.
- 33 need clearer policy information. The available rules do not yet support a reliable comparison.
Physical fit is not ticket allowance. A bag can fit the published measurements and still require a particular fare, add-on, route or aircraft. Unresolved results are never counted as fits.
155 matching airlines
Share or download results
| Airline | Carry-on · Overhead bin | Personal item · Under the seat | Ticket allowance | Evidence and next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copa AirlinesCM · Latin America | △ Close fit | ✕ Too large | Not confirmed | Source · Aug 10, 2026The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. 0.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? 0.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. What BagCheck used
|
| Sun Country AirlinesSY · North America | ✓ Fits | ✕ Too large | Not confirmed | Source · Aug 10, 2026The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. 2.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? 2.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. What BagCheck used
|
| Aegean AirlinesA3 · Europe | ? Needs checking | ? Needs checking | Not confirmed | Aircraft needed Source · 2026-08-21The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. Aircraft needed Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. What BagCheck used
|
| AeromexicoAM · North America | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Not confirmed | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · Aug 10, 2026The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Air BusanBX · Asia Pacific | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · 2026-08-21Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Air ChinaCA · Asia Pacific | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · 2026-08-27Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Air MauritiusMK · Africa | ? Needs checking | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Combined-size limit only Source · 2026-09-11Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Combined-size limit only Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. What BagCheck used
|
| Air New ZealandNZ · Asia Pacific | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Not confirmed | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · Aug 10, 2026The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Air North4N · North America | ? Needs checking | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Aircraft needed Source · 2026-09-15Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. Aircraft needed Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. What BagCheck used
|
| Air SerbiaJU · Europe | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · 2026-08-21Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Airlink4Z · Africa | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · 2026-09-11Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Akasa AirQP · Asia Pacific | ? Needs checking | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Combined-size limit only Source · 2026-08-21Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Combined-size limit only Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. What BagCheck used
|
| Alaska AirlinesAS · North America | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Not confirmed | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · 2026-08-27The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Asiana AirlinesOZ · Asia Pacific | ? Needs checking | ✕ Too large | Not confirmed | Combined-size limit only Source · Aug 10, 2026The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Combined-size limit only Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. What BagCheck used
|
| Bangkok AirwaysPG · Asia Pacific | ? Needs checking | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Aircraft needed Source · 2026-08-29Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. Aircraft needed Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. What BagCheck used
|
| Batik AirID · Asia Pacific | ? Needs checking | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Aircraft needed Source · 2026-08-21Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. Aircraft needed Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. What BagCheck used
|
| Canadian North5T · North America | ? Needs checking | ? Needs checking | Not confirmed | Aircraft needed Source · 2026-09-15The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. Aircraft needed Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? The published rectangular limit changes with the operating aircraft, so BagCheck will not guess. What BagCheck used
|
| China Southern AirlinesCZ · Asia Pacific | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · 2026-08-21Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Delta Air LinesDL · North America | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Not confirmed | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · Aug 10, 2026The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| EgyptAirMS · Africa | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · 2026-08-29Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| EmiratesEK · Middle East | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Not confirmed | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · Aug 10, 2026The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Ethiopian AirlinesET · Africa | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · 2026-08-27Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Etihad AirwaysEY · Middle East | ✕ Too large | ? Needs checking | Not confirmed | Under-seat measurements unavailable Source · Aug 10, 2026The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement. Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. Under-seat measurements unavailable Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? Too large for the published overhead limit; under-seat dimensions are unavailable. Confirm the personal-item limit with the airline. What BagCheck used
|
| Fiji AirwaysFJ · Asia Pacific | ? Needs checking | ? Needs checking | Carry-on included | Fare or route needed Source · 2026-08-21Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag. The published physical limit changes with fare or route, so BagCheck will not guess. Fare or route needed Source checked: Evidence and why this resultWhy this result? The published physical limit changes with fare or route, so BagCheck will not guess. What BagCheck used
|