BagCheck compares the three recorded measurements in the best physical orientation. It does not invent a missing axis label or assume that unknown protrusions are included.
Source
Where these details came from
Last checked
Unknown
Evidence
Continuation wave c1915nb, worker c1915nb-07. Every cited literal is the raw-byte re-slice of its own span inside the product's OWN feed object; the coordinator re-sliced every span from the retained capture bytes and re-derived each value with the maintained parser. Ownership pinned inside objectSpan [753603,772898]. Own exterior re-slices byte-exactly from the product's own '<table class="table--size-guide">' (Unit/Height/Width/Depth): Centimetre 14.98 / 19.55 / 4.57 -> [[14.98,19.55,4.57]] cm, corroborated by the Inch row [[14.986,19.558,4.572]]. Own capacity 'Capacity: 0.9 L' at [756361,756376] -> [0.9] L. The product's own text states a standalone worn bag (belt bag / crossbody bag with a zippered main compartment), so it is ELIGIBLE and CREATE_SUPPORTED, and it is not one of the accepted Monos records (no metro-belt-bag in the 1,813). Substantive review: SUPPORTED_AS_IS - Own exterior table and0.9L apply to standalone waist/crossbody bag with included removable strap; modular attachment is an additional use, not its only role. Distinct from accepted MetroSling/Crossbody.