One published bag configuration compared with all 141 active airline records. Physical fit and ticket allowance remain separate.
Configuration
Standard
Measurements
64.1 × 31.8 × 28.6 cm
Capacity
40 L
Empty weight
1.54 kg
Physical results
Every active airline is accounted for
141 / 141
0Fits
128Too Large
13Unresolved
Physical fit is not ticket allowance. A bag can fit the published measurements and still require a particular fare, add-on, route or aircraft. Unresolved results are never counted as fits.
Filter results
141 matching airlines
A3
Aegean Airlines
Europe
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
NH
ANA All Nippon Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
PG
Bangkok Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
ID
Batik Air
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
QG
Citilink
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
FJ
Fiji Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
GA
Garuda Indonesia
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
HU
Hainan Airlines
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
PC
Pegasus Airlines
Europe
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceDEPENDSDepends on your fare and your route.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Depends on your fare and your route.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SV
Saudia
Middle East
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SG
SpiceJet
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
9C
Spring Airlines
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
RO
TAROM
Europe
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
EI
Aer Lingus
Europe
Physical fitTOO LARGELongest side · 9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
AM
Aeromexico
North America
Physical fitTOO LARGELongest side · 9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
G9
Air Arabia
Middle East
Physical fitTOO LARGELongest side · 9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
KC
Air Astana
Asia Pacific
Physical fitTOO LARGELongest side · 8.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
8.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
BX
Air Busan
Asia Pacific
Physical fitTOO LARGECombined dimensions · 9.5 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.5 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
AC
Air Canada
North America
Physical fitTOO LARGELongest side · 9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceDEPENDSDepends on your fare, your route and when you bought the ticket.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Depends on your fare, your route and when you bought the ticket.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
CA
Air China
Asia Pacific
Physical fitTOO LARGECombined dimensions · 9.5 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.5 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
UX
Air Europa
Europe
Physical fitTOO LARGELongest side · 9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
AF
Air France
Europe
Physical fitTOO LARGELongest side · 9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
AI
Air India
Asia Pacific
Physical fitTOO LARGECombined dimensions · 9.5 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.5 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
IX
Air India Express
Asia Pacific
Physical fitTOO LARGELongest side · 8.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
8.1 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.