One published bag configuration compared with all 141 active airline records. Physical fit and ticket allowance remain separate.
Configuration
Expanded
Measurements
49.5 × 29.2 × 26.7 cm
Capacity
40 L
Empty weight
1.9 kg
Physical results
Every active airline is accounted for
141 / 141
4Fits
120Too Large
17Unresolved
Physical fit is not ticket allowance. A bag can fit the published measurements and still require a particular fare, add-on, route or aircraft. Unresolved results are never counted as fits.
Filter results
141 matching airlines
OZ
Asiana Airlines
Asia Pacific
Physical fitFITCombined dimensions · 9.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
BW
Caribbean Airlines
Latin America
Physical fitFITCombined dimensions · 8.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
8.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
CM
Copa Airlines
Latin America
Physical fitFITCombined dimensions · 9.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
9.6 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SY
Sun Country Airlines
North America
Physical fitCLOSE FITPacked depth · 1.3 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
1.3 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
A3
Aegean Airlines
Europe
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
QP
Akasa Air
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDCombined dimensions · Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
NH
ANA All Nippon Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
PG
Bangkok Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
ID
Batik Air
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
QG
Citilink
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
FJ
Fiji Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
GA
Garuda Indonesia
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
HU
Hainan Airlines
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
MM
Peach Aviation
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDCombined dimensions · Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
PC
Pegasus Airlines
Europe
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceDEPENDSDepends on your fare and your route.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Depends on your fare and your route.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SV
Saudia
Middle East
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SQ
Singapore Airlines
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDCombined dimensions · Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SG
SpiceJet
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
9C
Spring Airlines
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
UL
SriLankan Airlines
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDCombined dimensions · Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
RO
TAROM
Europe
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
EI
Aer Lingus
Europe
Physical fitTOO LARGEPacked depth · 2.7 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
2.7 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
AM
Aeromexico
North America
Physical fitTOO LARGEPacked depth · 1.7 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
1.7 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
G9
Air Arabia
Middle East
Physical fitTOO LARGEPacked depth · 6.7 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
6.7 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.