BagCheck

Check across airlines

Tom Bihn Truck

One published bag configuration compared with all 141 active airline records. Physical fit and ticket allowance remain separate.

Configuration
Standard
Measurements
43.9 × 31.8 × 27.9 cm
Capacity
25 L
Empty weight
Unknown

Physical results

Every active airline is accounted for

141 / 141
4Fits
120Too Large
17Unresolved

Physical fit is not ticket allowance. A bag can fit the published measurements and still require a particular fare, add-on, route or aircraft. Unresolved results are never counted as fits.

Filter results

141 matching airlines

OZ

Asiana Airlines

Asia Pacific

Physical fitFITCombined dimensions · 11.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

11.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
BW

Caribbean Airlines

Latin America

Physical fitFITCombined dimensions · 10.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

10.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
CM

Copa Airlines

Latin America

Physical fitFITCombined dimensions · 11.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

11.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SY

Sun Country Airlines

North America

Physical fitCLOSE FITPacked depth · 0.1 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

0.1 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
A3

Aegean Airlines

Europe

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
QP

Akasa Air

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDCombined dimensions · Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
NH

ANA All Nippon Airways

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
PG

Bangkok Airways

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
ID

Batik Air

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
QG

Citilink

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
FJ

Fiji Airways

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
GA

Garuda Indonesia

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
HU

Hainan Airlines

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
MM

Peach Aviation

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDCombined dimensions · Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
PC

Pegasus Airlines

Europe

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceDEPENDSDepends on your fare and your route.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Depends on your fare and your route.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SV

Saudia

Middle East

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SQ

Singapore Airlines

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDCombined dimensions · Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SG

SpiceJet

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
9C

Spring Airlines

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
UL

SriLankan Airlines

Asia Pacific

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDCombined dimensions · Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
RO

TAROM

Europe

Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
EI

Aer Lingus

Europe

Physical fitTOO LARGEPacked depth · 3.9 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

3.9 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
AM

Aeromexico

North America

Physical fitTOO LARGEPacked depth · 2.9 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

2.9 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
G9

Air Arabia

Middle East

Physical fitTOO LARGEPacked depth · 7.9 cm over the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?

7.9 cm over the limiting overhead measurement. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.

What BagCheck used
  • Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.