One published bag configuration compared with all 141 active airline records. Physical fit and ticket allowance remain separate.
Configuration
Standard
Measurements
55.6 × 35.6 × 23.1 cm
Capacity
45 L
Empty weight
Unknown
Physical results
Every active airline is accounted for
141 / 141
17Fits
107Too Large
17Unresolved
Physical fit is not ticket allowance. A bag can fit the published measurements and still require a particular fare, add-on, route or aircraft. Unresolved results are never counted as fits.
Filter results
141 matching airlines
KC
Air Astana
Asia Pacific
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
DM
Arajet
Latin America
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceDEPENDSDepends on your fare and your route.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Depends on your fare and your route.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
OZ
Asiana Airlines
Asia Pacific
Physical fitCLOSE FITCombined dimensions · 0.7 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.7 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
BA
British Airways
Europe
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
CM
Copa Airlines
Latin America
Physical fitCLOSE FITCombined dimensions · 0.7 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.7 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
U2
easyJet
Europe
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
F9
Frontier Airlines
North America
Physical fitFITPacked depth · 1.9 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
1.9 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
IB
Iberia
Europe
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
LS
Jet2.com
Europe
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
KU
Kuwait Airways
Middle East
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
ME
Middle East Airlines
Middle East
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
N0
Norse Atlantic Airways
Europe
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
OG
PLAY Airlines
Europe
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
WN
Southwest
North America
Physical fitFITPacked depth · 1.9 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
1.9 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
SY
Sun Country Airlines
North America
Physical fitFITPacked depth · 4.9 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
4.9 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
TG
Thai Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
Y4
Volaris
North America
Physical fitCLOSE FITLongest side · 0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
0.4 cm clear of the limiting overhead measurement. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
A3
Aegean Airlines
Europe
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceUNKNOWNThe published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. The published policy does not establish the large-cabin-bag entitlement.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
QP
Akasa Air
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDCombined dimensions · Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
Within the airline’s published linear-size limit, but the airline does not publish per-side dimensions, so physical fit cannot be guaranteed. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
NH
ANA All Nippon Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
PG
Bangkok Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
ID
Batik Air
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
QG
Citilink
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Geometry is identical across every currently viable policy; ticket inclusion still depends on trip context. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.
FJ
Fiji Airways
Asia Pacific
Physical fitUNRESOLVEDPublished geometry · The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit.
Ticket allowanceINCLUDEDEvery currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
Evidence and why this result
Why this result?
The airline does not publish rectangular dimensions or a linear-size limit. Every currently viable published policy includes a large cabin bag.
What BagCheck used
Published bag measurements, no compression, and no added planning margin.